- summary
- Ministry of Justice (Minister Nenad Vujić) proposes amendments to Criminal Code — public consultation September 15 to October 1 2025 (20-day window, criticized as insufficient by CSOs). Key provisions directly targeting protest movement and civil society: (1) Article 290 amended — road blockades criminalized as standalone offense with up to one year imprisonment. Previous version required actual endangerment of life, body, or major property. New version removes this condition — any protest blockade of any street becomes criminal offense regardless of actual risk. (2) Publishing material advising commission of crimes against constitutional order — criminalized, including anyone who "knowingly accesses such material." A social media "like" on a post calling for a protest could constitute criminal evidence of knowingly accessing material against the constitutional order. Law professor Vanja Bajović (Belgrade Law Faculty): "Your like is evidence that you knowingly accessed that material. There is a danger that citizens will out of fear avoid sharing content critical of the government. This would be a dangerous step toward criminalization of political and social dissent." (3) Recording conversations without consent criminalized — even recording your own conversation becomes criminal. Recordings without prior consent of all parties inadmissible as evidence — effectively protecting corrupt officials from whistleblowers. (4) New protection for tabloid media — intent requirement added for personal/family privacy violations, making it harder for victims of media smear campaigns to obtain justice. (5) Public commentary on final verdicts criminalized — expressing doubt about a final court decision becomes criminal offense. Građanske inicijative: "This is serious and dangerous precedent — the regime creates legal basis for settling scores with students and citizens who have been peacefully protesting for almost a year." Minister Vujić claims amendments have nothing to do with current situation. Legal basis in proposal explicitly states changes made due to "needs of practice" — GI: this proves amendments target suppression of legitimate right to freedom of assembly.
- country
- Serbia
- date text
- 15/09/2025
- entities
- Ministry of Justice; Minister Nenad Vujić; Government of Serbia; Aleksandar Vučić (proposal notes changes made "at the request of the President")
- entity type
- Government Official
- id
- 975
- name
- Ministry of Justice; Minister Nenad Vujić; Government of Serbia; Aleksandar Vučić (proposal notes changes made "at the request of the President")
- role
- actor
- Student protest movement; civil society organizations; citizens exercising right to protest; Građanske inicijative (named in primary source response)
- entity type
- Sector
- id
- 976
- name
- Student protest movement; civil society organizations; citizens exercising right to protest; Građanske inicijative (named in primary source response)
- role
- target
- Ministry of Justice; Minister Nenad Vujić; Government of Serbia; Aleksandar Vučić (proposal notes changes made "at the request of the President")
- sources
- citation
- Građanske inicijative statement September 15 2025 (gi.org.rs); Istinomer/Mihaela Šljukić "Svaki lajk i blokada puta mogu postati krivično delo" September 22 2025; CINGO Second Report on Serbia September 2025 (confirms 20-day consultation and CSO concerns about rushed process)
- tactics
- Legislative Operationalization
- label
- Legislative Operationalization
- code
- TC-18
- needs review
- false
- role
- primary
- Mass Criminalization of Protest and Civic Mobilization
- label
- Mass Criminalization of Protest and Civic Mobilization
- code
- TC-39
- needs review
- false
- role
- secondary
- Legislative Operationalization
- narratives
- Destabilization Agent
- label
- Destabilization Agent
- code
- NF-06
- needs review
- false
- role
- primary
- Political Interference
- label
- Political Interference
- code
- NF-09
- needs review
- false
- role
- secondary
- Destabilization Agent
- campaign ids
- campaign phase
- Phase 4: Institutional Operationalization
- channels
- Official/Regulatory
- civic response
- Građanske inicijative public warning September 15 2025; Law professor Vanja Bajović (Belgrade Law Faculty) documents unconstitutionality in Istinomer; CINGO second report (Sep 2025) flags 20-day consultation as insufficient; multiple CSOs demand withdrawal of proposal
- consequence category
- Legal/Administrative
- created at
- 2026-09-24T17:50:55.358311+00:00
- date precision
- day
- escalation
- 4
- harm track
- Track 1 — Legal/Administrative
- id
- SRB-073
- institutional consequence
- Road blockades criminalized as standalone offense — any protest blockade punishable by up to 1 year imprisonment; social media engagement with protest content potentially criminal; whistleblower recordings inadmissible; tabloid smear campaigns legally protected; public court criticism criminalized
- notes
- ANALYTICALLY IMPORTANT: explicitly political legislative activation. Proposal notes penal changes made "at the request of the President" — direct presidential authorization of legislative operationalization. Five distinct attack vectors in single legislation: (1) protest criminalization; (2) social media liability; (3) whistleblower protection removal; (4) tabloid legal protection; (5) court commentary criminalization. The "like" criminalization mechanism is particularly significant — creates chilling effect on social media engagement with protest content without requiring any formal charge. Article 54 of Serbian Constitution guarantees freedom of assembly — GI: these amendments violate the Constitution. ECHR Article 11 also directly implicated. Cross-ref SRB-CAMP-006 (Feb 2025 raids on same organizations now threatened with criminal liability for road blockades). Status: consultation ended October 1 2025 — adoption status TBC.
- occurred on
- 2025-09-15
- signal ids
- trigger type
- TR-02: Civic Mobilization
- updated at
- 2026-09-24T17:50:55.358311+00:00
- version
- 1
The public research collection