{"id":"SRB-114","notes":"This fits the documented Serbian doctrine of converting civic actors into criminal security threats and using the state's victimhood as the legal basis for enforcement. The distinctive element here is the bait-and-switch sequence — the activist appears as a documented victim of a 2023 attack, then is searched and detained on a separate 'endangering the president' charge, illustrating how accountability claims by civic actors are reversed into criminal exposure for those actors.","country":"Serbia","sources":[{"url":"https://n1info.rs/vesti/uhapsen-aktivista-iz-raske-zbog-navodnog-ugrozavanja-bezbednosti-vucica-na-instagramu/","citation":"https://n1info.rs/vesti/uhapsen-aktivista-iz-raske-zbog-navodnog-ugrozavanja-bezbednosti-vucica-na-instagramu/"}],"summary":"Serbian police detained activist Veljko Raković from Raška for up to 48 hours, accusing him of endangering the security of the President through content shared on Instagram allegedly threatening the president, his family, government members, and police. Raković had reported to the Interior Ministry that morning in his capacity as a victim of a 2023 attack, but was instead searched at his family home (over an hour, transparents and flags photographed, phone and laptop access demanded) and detained under criminal suspicion of endangering security; he is to be transferred to Belgrade for prosecutorial questioning.","tactics":[{"code":"TC-52","role":"primary","label":"Inverted Victimhood as Enforcement Pretext","needs_review":false},{"code":"TC-20","role":"secondary","label":"Security Apparatus Enforcement","needs_review":false}],"version":1,"channels":["Police detention and home search, MUP official statement, Prosecution referral, Social media (Instagram) as cited basis"],"entities":[{"id":1051,"name":"Serbian Interior Ministry (MUP), Serbian police, competent prosecutor (Belgrade)","role":"actor","entity_type":"Security Forces / Government Official / Prosecutor"},{"id":1052,"name":"Veljko Raković — civic activist from Raška, broader protest/activist movement","role":"target","entity_type":"Individual — Civic Activist"}],"date_text":"June 2026","created_at":"2026-09-24T17:50:55.358311+00:00","escalation":4,"harm_track":"Criminal enforcement — up to 48h detention; home search with seizure demands (phone, laptop, transparents/flags photographed); transfer to Belgrade for prosecutorial questioning; criminal proceeding for endangering security","narratives":[{"code":"LEGACY-N-e7f15ec49202","role":"primary","label":"Threat to the security of the head of state and his family","needs_review":true},{"code":"LEGACY-N-8d3b60251849","role":"secondary","label":"Destabilization / threat to public order","needs_review":true}],"report_ids":[],"signal_ids":[],"updated_at":"2026-09-24T17:50:55.358311+00:00","occurred_on":"2026-06-01","campaign_ids":["SRB-CAMP-012"],"enabler_type":"","response_ids":[],"trigger_type":"Root trigger: Raković's civic activism and online expression critical of the regime, including his prior status as a victim/complainant in a 2023 attack case that itself constituted accountability pressure on local authorities. | Activation signal: Police search of Raković's family home and his detention under an 'endangering the security of the President' criminal suspicion, executed after he voluntarily appeared as a victim/complainant — the apparatus pivoted from his complaint to enforcement against him on a separate basis. — Reactive to Watchdog/Civic Activity","campaign_phase":"Administrative Enforcement","civic_response":"Defense lawyer Mirsen Alibašić publicly confirmed and contested the detention; opposition/civic figures (Aleksić, others) publicly framed the action as regime retaliation; Novi Sad citizens' assemblies and activist networks documented the pattern.","date_precision":"month","enabler_status":"","campaigns_served":[],"consequence_category":"","institutional_consequence":"Criminal detention up to 48 hours; home search conducted; phone/laptop access demanded; transfer to Belgrade for prosecutorial questioning; criminal proceeding for 'endangering security' opened against a named activist."}